December 01, 2007

Campaigning for a New Legacy
Bill Clinton has told so many lies, it's doubtful he even knows the truth. Worse, he doesn't realize or care how foolish he looks when documented evidence showing that he is a liar is broadcast globally. Is it possible he is trying to undermine Hillary's campaign while at the same time reinventing his "legacy?"

Hillary is trying to steer clear of the Iraq issue. It has her pegged as a flip-flopper. Although, she recently has stated that she doesn't support the war on terror, she voted to authorize it. Now, that the surge has worked, she wants us to forget of her now opposing the war on terror. Yet, Bill is starting to sound like the spineless loser, John Kerry, "I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it."

While campaigning for Hillary, Bill told his audience that he opposed the war in Iraq from the very beginning. No matter that he long ago spoke of the need to stop Saddam Hussein and his weapons of mass destruction (WMD). In 2003, he even said, "I supported the president (George W) when he asked the Congress for authority to stand up against weapons of mass destruction in Iraq."

Bill said that his wife has experience. She worked on problems both in Arkansas while he was governor and in the White House while he was president. Could those "problems" have been the multitude of women competing for Bill's affections? Bill failed to mention Travel-gate, the failed healthcare takeover scheme, cattle futures trading fraud, Vince Foster and other scandolus "experience" Hillary has.

No, we should picture Bill Clinton as a 70's used car salesman wearing white shoes, "What'll it take to put this baby in the White House?"

TLG

Care to Comment?