January 12, 2007
"Do it for the Children"
The liberal mantra that is chanted over and over when they have absolutely no substance to their argument. The latest twist on this was spewed by California's democrat senator, Barbara Boxer.
Not known for her intelligence, Boxer decided to have a battle of wits and with Secretary of State, Dr. Condoleezza Rice. Boxer was asking questions of Secretary Rice for the Senate's Foreign Relations Committee about Iraq. This seems odd, because the closest Boxer has ever come to foreign relations is having Chinese take-out food.
Boxer asked who pays the ultimate price for war. A totally stupid question, and yes, there are stupid questions. The question is stupid because it implies a false premise, that there is some price too high for freedom. However, it's not so much Boxer's stupidity, but the dirty, mean and nasty way she asked it.
The haggard looking Boxer said to Dr. Rice, "Who pays the price? I'm not going to pay a personal price. My kids are too old and my grandchild is too young. You're not going to pay a particular price, as I understand it, with an immediate family. So who pays the price?" The snide implication wasn't lost on Dr. Rice. Boxer was telling Dr. Rice that she can't make the right decisions because she doesn't have children. In other words, "You can't do it for the children, because you don't have any."
Aren't we just a little tired of this? Where are the NOW hags? After all, Boxer has just said that single women without children have no clue in a professional world. Liberals just can't seem to insult a conservative without wiping out an entire group of their own liberal constituents. Not only that, but Boxer, a Jew, might want to ask the people of Israel what they think of her stupidity.
Let's answer Boxer's question, as if she really meant to ask it. Who pays the price for war? It's the liberal cowards that have to live with themselves every day after a conservative has made the world safe enough for them to spout their stupidity.
TLG
Care
to Comment?
